Academic Journal of Psychology and Education (AJPE)

FORCED-CHOICE PRIME VISIBILITY TEST: UNRAVELING THE TARGET SEQUENTIAL EFFECT

Authors

  • Zhang Wei Xin Applied Psychology, School of Public Administration, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang, 550025, China.
  • Chen Hui Lei Department of Psychology, College of Teacher Education, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua, 321004, China.
  • Liu Mei Yong Department of Psychology, School of Social and Behavior Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing, 210023, China

Abstract

Unconscious processing of visual stimuli is a crucial area of study, and it is essential to ensure that the processing is indeed unconscious. This study explores the methods for ascertaining unconscious processing, including subjective reports and the combination of subjective and objective measures. Blindsight, a phenomenon in which individuals exhibit above-chance accuracy in identifying "undetected" stimuli, even though they claim not to see them, serves as a prominent example. While some researchers argue that blindsight represents severely degraded processing, many others contend that it is evidence of unconscious visual processing. This paper delves into the subjectivity of reports in indicating unconsciousness to visual stimuli and explores the implications of blindsight for the understanding of unconscious processing.

Keywords:

Unconscious processing, subliminal stimuli, blindsight, subjective reports, visual cortex

Published

2024-06-14

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11655392%20

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, W. X., Lei, C. H., & Yong, L. M. (2024). FORCED-CHOICE PRIME VISIBILITY TEST: UNRAVELING THE TARGET SEQUENTIAL EFFECT . Academic Journal of Psychology and Education (AJPE), 15(6), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11655392

References

Ansorge, U., Khalid, S., Laback, B. (2016). Unconscious cross-modal priming of auditory sound localization by visual words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(6), 925-937.

Atas, A., Vermeiren, A., Cleeremans, A. (2013). Repeating a strongly masked stimulus increases priming and awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 22(4), 1422-1430.

Cheesman, J., Merikle, P. M. (1986). Distinguishing conscious from unconscious perceptual processes. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 40(4), 343.

Dienes, Z., Altmann, G. T. M., Kwan, L., Goode, A. (1995). Unconscious knowledge of artificial grammars is applied strategically. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(5), 1322-1338.

Faivre, N., Mudrik, L., Schwartz, N., Koch, C. (2014). Multisensory Integration in Complete Unawareness. Psychological Science, 25(11), 2006-2016.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical science. Behavior Research methods, 39(2), 175-199.

Finkbeiner, M., Palermo, R. (2009). The Role of Spatial Attention in Nonconscious Processing: A Comparison of Face and Nonface Stimuli. Psychological Science, 20(1), 42-51.

Hancock, J. C., Wintz, P. A. (1966). Signal Detection Theory. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(2001), 232239.

Izatt, G., Dubois, J., Faivre, N., Koch, C. (2014). A direct comparison of unconscious face processing under masking and interocular suppression. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 659.

Kiefer, M., Brendel, D. (2006). Attentional Modulation of Unconscious "Automatic" Processes: Evidence from Event-related Potentials in a Masked Priming Paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(2), 184-198.

Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search. Nature, 334(6181), 430-431.

Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4), 346-352.

Laming, D. R. J. (1997). The measurement of sensation. London: Oxford University Press.

Liu, C., Sun, Z., Jou, J., Cui, Q., Zhao, G., Qiu, J., et al. (2016). Unconscious Processing of Facial Emotional Valence Relation: Behavioral Evidence of Integration between Subliminally Perceived Stimuli. PLOS ONE, 11(9), e162689.

Newell, B. R., Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38(01), 1-19.

Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social cognition, 19(6), 625-666.

Opstal, F. V., Gevers, W., Osman, M., Verguts, T. (2010). Unconscious task application. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 999-1006.

Overgaard, M. (2015). Behavioral methods in consciousness research: Oxford University Press, USA.

Overgaard, M., Fehl, K., Mouridsen, K., Bergholt, B., Cleeremans, A. (2008). Seeing without Seeing? Degraded Conscious Vision in a Blindsight Patient. PLoS ONE, 3(8), e3028.

Persaud, N., McLeod, P., Cowey, A. (2007). Post-decision wagering objectively measures awareness. Nature Neuroscience, 10(2), 257-261.

Phillips, I. (2021). Blindsight is qualitatively degraded conscious vision. Psychological Review, 128(3), 558-584.

Pöppel, E., Held, R., Frost, D. (1973). Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man. Nature, 243(5405), 295-296.

Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3), 211-228.

Peremen, Z., Lamy, D. (2014). Do conscious perception and unconscious processing rely on independent mechanisms? A meta-contrast study. Consciousness and Cognition, 24, 22-32.

Ramsøy, T. Z., Overgaard, M. (2004). Introspection and subliminal perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 3(1), 1-23.

Robbins, T. W., Anderson, E. J., Barker, D. R., Bradley, A. C., Fearnyhough, C., Henson, R., et al. (1996). Working memory in chess. Memory & Cognition, 24(1), 83-93.

Steward, N., Brown, G. D. A., & Chater, N. (2005). Absolute identification by relative judgment. Psychological Review, 112 (4), 881-911.

Taylor, T., & Klein, R. M. (1998). On the cause and effects of inhibition of return. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5(4), 625-643.

Tipper, S. P. (2001). Does negative priming reflect inhibitory mechanisms? A review and integration of conflicting views. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 54(2), 321–343.

Tsuchiya, N., Koch, C. (2005). Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1096-1101.

Tu, S., Wan, S., Jou, J., Ma, Y., Zhao, G., Pan, W. (2020). Can unconscious sequential integration of semantic information occur when the prime Chinese characters are displayed from left to right? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 82(3), 1221-1229.

Valdés, B., Catena, A., Marí-Beffa, P. (2005). Automatic and controlled semantic processing: A masked prime-task effect. Consciousness & Cognition, 14(2), 278-295. van Gaal, S., Naccache, L., Meuwese, J. D. I., van Loon, A. M., Leighton, A. H., Cohen, L., et al. (2014). Can the meaning of multiple words be integrated unconsciously? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 369(1641), 20130212.

Van Opstal, F., Gevers, W., Osman, M., Verguts, T. (2010). Unconscious task application. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(4), 999-1006.

Wang, R., Fu, Y., Chen, L., Chen, Y., Zhou, J., Chen, H. (2021). Consciousness can overflow report: novel evidence from attribute amnesia of a single stimulus. Consciousness and Cognition, 87, 103052.

Zhou, J., Lee, C., Li, K., Tien, Y., Yeh, S. (2016). Does Temporal Integration Occur for Unrecognizable Words in Visual Crowding? PLOS ONE, 11(2), e149355.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.