FROM STUDY TO COURTROOM: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF SELFDIRECTED LEARNING ON TRIAL LAWYERS' SUCCESS
Abstract
This abstract probes into the intricate landscape of legal practice, particularly focusing on the post-bar exam phase where newly licensed lawyers embark on diverse career trajectories. The backdrop for this exploration is the staggering number of law school graduates, exemplified by the 2022 statistics revealing over 35,000 graduates with approximately 26,000 successfully passing state bar exams (ABA, 2023). The narrative unfolds against the backdrop of the prevalent trend where a significant cohort of these newly minted lawyers chooses to initiate their own law firms rather than gain experience within established legal offices. The prevailing scenario prompts a critical examination of the competence and readiness of these new lawyers, who, upon passing the bar, enter a profession that allows them to practice across a spectrum of legal domains. The abstract challenges the assumption that successful passage of the bar exam automatically confers expertise in areas such as contracts, employment, corporate law, personal injury, domestic law, and criminal law. It posits that the broad range of legal subjects covered in the bar exam does not necessarily translate into comprehensive expertise. With an emphasis on the common trajectory of these new lawyers becoming general practitioners, the narrative delves into the paradox of competence. It questions how these legal professionals, despite limited or no experience in specific areas of law, navigate the diverse caseloads they encounter in their practice. The exploration acknowledges the prevalent advice provided through continuing legal education programs and professional development materials on starting a law firm but underscores the need for a deeper understanding of the implications of general practice. In conclusion, this abstract illuminates the complexities surrounding the competence of new lawyers transitioning into general practice. It raises fundamental questions about the assumptions regarding expertise post-bar exam and the challenges faced by those venturing into diverse legal domains without specialized experience.
Keywords:
Legal Practice, Bar Exam, General Practice, Competence, Legal EducationDownloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10572786%20Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Dr. Grant Alexander Hostak, Prof. Samantha Marie Lawson

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
American Bar Association. (2023). 2023 Summary Bar Pass Data: Race, Ethnicity, and Gender.
https://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/administrative/legal_education_and_admissions_to_th e_bar/statistics/2023/2023-bpq-national-summary-data-race-ethnicity-gender.pdf
Armstrong, K. J. (2010). Self-directed learning in Athletic Training Education. Athletic Therapy Today, 15(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1123/att.15.1.19.
Behar-Horenstein, L. S., Beck, D. E., &Su, Y. (2018). An initial validation study of the self-rating scale of selfdirected learning for Pharmacy Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 82(3), 6251. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6251.
Birzer, M. (2003). The theory of andragogy applied to police training. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 26(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/13639510310460288.
Cadorin, L., Suter, N., Saiani, L., Naskar Williamson, S., &Palese, A. (2010). Self-rating scale of self-directed learning (SRSSDL): Preliminary results from the Italian validation process. Journal of Research in Nursing, 16(4), 363–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987110379790 .
Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Inc.
Henschke, J. (2004). Thinking about andragogy: The international foundation for its research, theory andpractice linkage in adult education and human resource development. IACE Hall of FameRepository.
Hill, M., Peters, M., Salvaggio, M., Vinnedge, J., & Darden, A. (2020). Implementation and evaluation of a selfdirected learning activity for first-year medical students. Medical Education Online, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2020.1717780.
Knowles, M. S. (1968). Andragogy, not pedagogy. Adult Leadership, 16(10), 351.
Lubin, M. (2013). Coaching the adult learner: A framework for engaging the principles and processes ofandragogy for best practices in coaching. ProQuest LLC. Ann Arbor,MI.
Mackenzie, N., & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 193-205. MO Sup. Ct. R. 4.1-1
Rager, K. B. (2003). The self-directed learning of women with breast cancer. Adult Education Quarterly, 53(4), 277– 293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713603254030 Shostak, G. (2019). The intersection of andragogy and courtroom practice. Dissertations. 90. https://digitalcommons.lindenwood.edu/dissertations/90.
Wang, V. & Bryan, V. (Eds.). (2014). Andragogical and pedagogical methods for curriculum and program development. Advances in Educational Technologies and Instructional Design. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-14666-5872-1.
Williamson, S. N. (2007). Development of a self-rating scale of self-directed learning. Nurse Researcher, 14, 2, 66-83.