Contemporary Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship Research (CJBER)

ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN THE WATER INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Maria Elena Rodriguez Fuentes Centrum Católica Graduate Business School, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Perú.

Abstract

Water supply utilities, once operating in relative obscurity, have now become the focus of heightened scrutiny. The convergence of stringent drinking water and environmental standards, along with increased public awareness and financial challenges, has led to waning confidence in the competence and sustainability of these utilities. Despite these challenges, the water industry remains a substantial and expanding sector, with its true economic significance only recently coming to light. This study examines the evolving landscape of the water industry, highlighting the varied growth across its sectors and the trend towards consolidation and unification within the industry. Through an analysis of current regulatory frameworks, public perceptions, and economic data, the research aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the factors driving the transformation of water supply utilities. The findings underscore the need for innovative approaches to enhance the efficiency, sustainability, and public trust in the water industry, ensuring its continued growth and relevance in the global economy

Keywords:

Water Supply Utilities, Sustainability, Public Perception, Regulatory Standards, Economic Significance

Downloads

Published

2024-07-26

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12916001

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 4 (2024): July-August

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fuentes, M. E. R. (2024). ECONOMIC SIGNIFICANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY IN THE WATER INDUSTRY. Contemporary Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship Research (CJBER), 8(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12916001

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Maria Elena Rodriguez Fuentes

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Budd J, McGranahan G (2003). Are the debates on water privatization missing the point? Experiences from Africa, Asia and Latin America. Environ. Urban, 15(2): 87-113.

Clarke GRG, Kosec K, Wallsten S (2009). Has Private Participation in water and sewerage improved coverage. J. Int. Dev., 21(3): 327-361.

Delfino JA, Casarin AA, DElfino ME (2007). How far does it go? The Buenos Aires concession: A decade after the reform. UNRISD, Geneva.

ILO International Labour Office (1976). Employment Growth and Basic Needs: a one-world problem: Report of the Director-General of the International Labour Office. Geneva: I.L.O.

Klitgaard RE (1988). Controlling Corruption. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.

McGerr M (2003). A Fierce Discontent: The Rise and Fall of the Progressive Movement in America, 1870-1920. New York: Oxford University Press.

Segerfeldt F (2005). Water for Sale: How Business and Market can resolve the World‟s Water Crisis. Cato Institute, Washington DC.

Stottman W (2000). The role of the private sector in the provision of water and wastewater services in urban areas. In Water for Urban Areas, Uitto JI, Biswas AK (eds.). United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp. 156-199.

Transparency International (2008). Global Corruption Report: Corruption in the Water Sector. Berlin: Transparency International.

Tremolet S, Neale J (2002). Emerging Lessons in Private Provision of Infrastructure Services in Rural Areas: Water and Electricity Services in Gabon. World Bank, Washington, DC.

WMO, World Metereological Organisation (1992) International Conference on Water and the Environment: the Dublin Statement and Report of the Conference. Geneva: WMO.

World Bank (2006). Approaches to Private Participation in Water Services. World Bank, Washington, DC.