Economics and Statistics Research Journal (ESRJ)

STRATEGIC REVENUE ENHANCEMENT: OPTIMIZING RISK-WEIGHTED ASSET MANAGEMENT

Authors

  • Thembekile Jabulani Mkhize Doctor of Business Leadership, University of South Africa, South Africa

Abstract

The cancellation of insurance contracts poses significant risks to banks, potentially leading to severe asset value decimation and exposure to insurable damages. To mitigate these risks, banks must implement strategies that ensure continuous insurance coverage for their assets. One effective approach is to raise fees commensurate with the risk-weight of assets whose insurance contracts are cancelled. This method encourages banks to consistently verify the existence of insurance cover through monthly requests for copies, facilitated by advanced systems and methods developed for insurance verification. Such a strategy aligns with practices like force-placed insurance, which is imposed on borrowers who halt their homeowners’ insurance due to defaulting on mortgage commitments (Cronkite-Chi and Kent, 2016). By adopting this risk-weight-based fee generation method, banks can enhance their risk mitigation efforts and improve performance, countering the impact of the Basel III accord on income-generating capacity.

Keywords:

Risk mitigation Insurance verification Asset protection Fee generation Basel III compliance

Published

2024-07-30

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13134519

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Thembekile , J. M. (2024). STRATEGIC REVENUE ENHANCEMENT: OPTIMIZING RISK-WEIGHTED ASSET MANAGEMENT. Economics and Statistics Research Journal (ESRJ), 15(4), 17–24. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13134519

References

Aliaga-Diaz, R.,&Oliviero, M.P. (2012). Do bank capital requirements amplify business cycles? Bridging the gap between theory and empirical. Macroeconomic dynamics, (16) (3), 358-395

Anthony, S. (2015). Is Basel turning banks into public utilities? Journal of financial perspectives, (3) (1)

Carande, C., &Anzevino, A. (2010). Beyond turbulent times: Transforming banking business models. Journal of Bank accounting and finance, (23) (5), 37-40

Cosimano, T.F., &Hakura, D.S. (2011). Bank behavior in response to Basel 111: A cross-country analysis. IMF working paper, no. 11/119

Cronkite-Chi, D.,& Kent, L. (2016). Force placed insurance: The lending industry’s dirty little secret.Heinonline

Dedu, V.,&Nitesco, D.C. (2012). Basel 111-between global thinking and local acting. Theoretical and applied economics, (19) (6), 5-12

De Giovanni, D. (2010) Lapse rate modelling a rational expectation approach, (1), Scandinavian actuarial journal

Dermine, J. (2013) Bank regulations after the global financial crisis: Good intentions and unintended evil. Journal of European financial management, (19) (4), 658-674

Giordana, G.A.,& Schumacher, I. (2013). Bank liquidity risk and monetary policy, Empirical evidence on the impact of Basel 111 liquidity standards. International review of applied economics, (27) (5), 633-655

Handorf, W.C. (2014). The cost of bank liquidity. Journal of bank regulation, (15) (1), 1-13

Harle, P., Luders, E., Pepanides, T., Pfetch, s., Poppensieker, T.,&Stegemann, U. (2011). Basel 111 and European banking: Its impact, how banks might respond, the challenges of its implementation. Global McKinsey working papers on risk,no. 26

Hermann, D.L. (2011) The Basel capital adequacy accords and the governance of global finance. UMI, 1-257

Jayadev, M. (2013). Basel 111 implementation: issues and challenges for Indian banks. IIMB management review, 25, 115-130

Lee, T.H.,&Chih, S.H. (2013).Does financial regulations affect the profit efficiency and risk of banks? Evidence from China’s commercial banks. The North American journal of economics and finance, (26) (C), 705-724

Nucu, A.E. (2011). The challenges of Basel 111 for Romanian banking system. Theoretical and applied economics, (18) (12), 59-70

Paskelian, O., & Bell, S. (2013). The tale of two regulations-Dodd Frank act and Basil III: A review and comparison of the two regulatory frameworks. Review of futures markets, 21, 7-29

Rudin, J.N., (2012). Basel 111: The banking band-aid?. Brooklyn journal of corporate, financial and commercial law, (6) (2), 621-647

Sutorova, B.,&Teply, P. (2013). The impact of Basel 111 on lending rates of EU banks. Journal of economics and finance, (63) (3), 226-243

Wang, M.S. (2014). Financial innovation, Basel accord 111, and bank value. Emerging markets finance and trade, (50) (2), 23-42

Vallascas, F.,&Hargendorff, J. (2013). The risk sensitivity of capital requirements: Evidence from an international sample of large banks. Review of finance, (17) (6), 1947-1988

Vanessa, L.,&Yrievna, A.S. (2012). Revisiting risk-weighted assets, IMF paper no. 12/90

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.