Economics and Statistics Research Journal (ESRJ)

RISK OF CHRONIC MENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS IN DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES OF YOUNG ADULT: A META-ANALYSIS

Authors

  • Adehi M.U. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Abuja, Nigeria
  • Chaku S.E. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Abubakar Tafawa Balewa University, Bauchi
  • Madaki R.M. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi-Nigeria
  • Adenomon M.O. Department of Statistics, Faculty of Natural and Applied Sciences, Nasarawa State University, Keffi-Nigeria

Abstract

Background: Chronic mental health conditions among young adults represent a growing public health concern. Despite increasing attention, fragmented studies, varied methodologies, and inconsistent diagnostic criteria have hindered clear conclusions about prevalence and risk factors. This study employs a meta-analysis approach to synthesize available research and provide robust evidence on the risk of chronic mental health conditions in young adults. The aim of the paper is to determine the fixed and random effect models on the risk of chronic mental health conditions in demographic variables of young adults, assess heterogeneity measures, and validate the models through publication bias analysis and funnel plot assessments.

Methodology: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of Google Scholar and PubMed was conducted, identifying 321,438 studies. After screening, 12 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Data were extracted regarding odds ratios (ORs), confidence intervals (CIs), and demographic variables. Both fixed and random effects models were applied based on heterogeneity assessments. Heterogeneity was evaluated using Q-statistics and I² statistics, while publication bias was assessed via funnel plots.

Results: The meta-analysis revealed a pooled odds ratio (OR) of 1.78 (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.45–2.12) for the risk of chronic mental health conditions among young adults. This indicates that young adults have a 78% increased risk compared to controls. The heterogeneity among studies was moderate to high (I² = 56%), suggesting variability in effect sizes across studies. Funnel plot analysis showed minimal publication bias. Subgroup analyses by demographic variables such as age, gender, and occupation further highlighted significant risk differences.

Conclusion: The findings highlight that young adults are at a considerable risk for chronic mental health issues, influenced by demographic factors. These results underscore the need for targeted preventive strategies, early interventions, and the development of comprehensive policies aimed at mental health promotion in young populations. Meta-analytical evidence supports the importance of demographic-specific mental health strategies to mitigate long-term impacts.

Keywords:

Meta-analysis, Young Adults, Chronic Mental Health Conditions, Random Effects Model, Confidence Interval, Effect Size, Heterogeneity, Publication Bias

Published

2025-08-21

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16918833

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Adehi , M. U., Chaku , S. E., Madaki , R. M., & Adenomon , M. O. (2025). RISK OF CHRONIC MENTAL HEALTH CONDITIONS IN DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLES OF YOUNG ADULT: A META-ANALYSIS. Economics and Statistics Research Journal (ESRJ), 16(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16918833

References

Adehi M.U. Omole O.O. Adenomon M.O. Bilkisu M. (2024) Randomized Controlled Trial Based Meta-Analysis of the Risk of Mortality in Sickle Cell Patients, International journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, Vol. 12, No.3, pp.15-24

Adehi M.U. Madaki R.M. Chaku S.E. Adenomon M.O. Omole O.O. (2025) Meta-Analysis on the Risk of Chronic Mental Health Conditions in Young Adults, Economics and Statistics Research Journal (ESRJ) Vol. 16 (4).

Arnold, R., Ranchor, A., Sanderman, R., Kempen, G., Ormel, J., & Suurmeijer, T. (2004). The relative contribution of domains of quality of life to overall quality of life for different chronic diseases. Quality of Life Research, 13(5), 883-896.

Attal, N., Lanteri-Minet, M., Laurent, B., Fermanian, J., & Bouhassira, D. (2011). The specific disease burden of neuropathic pain: Results of a French nationwide survey. Pain, 152(12), 2836-2843. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2011.09.014

Barakat, L. P., Li, Y., Hobbie, W. L., Ogle, S. K., Hardie, T., Volpe, E. M., . . . Deatrick, J. A. (2015). Health-related quality of life of adolescent and young adult survivors of childhood brain tumors. Psycho-Oncology, 24(7), 804-811.

Barofsky, I. (2011). Quality: Its definition and measurement as applied to the medically ill. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

Breivik, H., Collett, B., Ventafridda, V., Cohen, R., & Gallacher, D. (2006). Survey of chronic pain in Europe: Prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. European Journal of Pain (London, England), 10(4), 287-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009

Bair, M. J., Robinson, L. E., Katon, W., & Kroenke, K. (2003). Depression and pain comorbidity: A literature review. Archives of Internal Medicine, 163, 2433- 2445.

Eccleston, C., & Crombez, G. (1999). Pain demands attention: a cognitive-affective model of the interruptive function of pain. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 356-366.

Eccleston, C., Williams, A. C., & Morley, S. (2009). Psychological therapies for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD007407.

Elliott, A. M., Smith, B. H., Penny, K. I., Smith, W. C., & Chambers, W. A. (1999). The epidemiology of chronic pain in the community. Lancet, 354(9186), 1248- 1252.

Flor, H., & Turk, D. C. (2015). Chronic pain: an integrated biobehavioral approach. London, UK: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Geber, C., Baumgärtner, U., Schwab, R., Müller, H., Stoeter, P., Dieterich, M., Treede, R.-D. (2009). Revised Definition of Neuropathic Pain and Its Grading System: An Open Case Series Illustrating Its Use in Clinical Practice. The American Journal of Medicine, 122(10, Supplement), S3-S12. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.04.005

Hadjistavropoulos, T., & Craig, K. D. (2004). Pain: psychological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hudson, J. L., & Chilcot, J. (2015). Psychological Distress in Physical Long-Term Conditions. In D. Goldsmith, A. Covic & J. Spaak (Eds.), Cardio-Renal Clinical Challenges (pp. 227-234). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing

McCarberg, B. H., Nicholson, B. D., Todd, K. H., Palmer, T., & Penles, L. (2008). The impact of pain on quality of life and the unmet needs of pain management: Results from pain sufferers and physicians participating in an Internet survey. American Journal of Therapeutics, 15(4), 312-320.

Livneh, H. (2014). Disability and Chronic Illness. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Health, Illness, Behavior, and Society (pp. 398-401)

Legrain, V., Damme, S. V., Eccleston, C., Davis, K. D., Seminowicz, D. A., & Crombez, G. (2009). A neurocognitive model of attention to pain: behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Pain, 144(3), 230-232.

McCracken, L. M., Sato, A., & Taylor, G. J. (2013). A Trial of a Brief Group-Based Form of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain in General Practice: Pilot Outcome and Process Results. The Journal of Pain, 14(11), 1398-1406. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.06.011

McCurry, S. M., Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K., Bissett, R., Pistorello, J., . . . Batten, S. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The psychological record (54), 553-578. McDowell, I. (2006). Measuring health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press

Maniadakis, N., & Gray, A. (2000). The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain, 84(1), 95-103.

Melzack, R. (2001). Pain and the neuromatrix in the brain. Journal of Dental Education, 65, 1378-1382. Melzack, R., & Wall, P. D. (1965). Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Science, 150, 971-979. Merskey, H., & Bogduk, N. (1994). Classification of Chronic Pain (2nd ed.). Seattle, USA: IASP Pess

Naylor, C., Parsonage, M., McDaid, D., Knapp, M., Fossey, M., & Galea, A. (2012). Long-term conditions and mental health: The cost of co-morbidities. London, UK: The King's Fund.

Nolte, E., & McKee, M. (2008). Caring For People With Chronic Conditions: A Health System Perspective: A Health System Perspective. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

O'Halloran, J., Miller, G. C., & Britt, H. (2004). Defining chronic conditions for primary care with ICPC-2. Family Practice, 21(4), 381-386.

Schiltenwolf, M., Akbar, M., Hug, A., Pfuller, U., Gantz, S., Neubauer, E., Wang, H. (2014). Evidence of specific cognitive deficits in patients with chronic low back pain under long-term substitution treatment of opioids. Pain Physician, 17(1), 9-20.

Weiner, D. K., Rudy, T. E., Morrow, L., Slaboda, J., & Lieber, S. (2006). The relationship between pain, neuropsychological performance, and physical function in community-dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain. Pain Medicine, 7(1), 60-70.

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.