EXPLORING PSYCHOANALYSIS AND GENDER DISPARITY: AN INDEPTH EXAMINATION OF PENIS ENVY
Abstract
This paper critically reevaluates Sigmund Freud's concept of penis envy and its implications for psychoanalytic theory. While Freud's theory was groundbreaking in its time, this study highlights its limitations and questions its applicability in understanding women's desires. By examining the historical context of Freud's work, we revisit the development of his theory and its impact on the field of psychoanalysis. Through a contemporary lens, we argue that penis envy primarily serves as a symbol of social gender inequalities rather than an accurate representation of women's longings. This analysis emphasizes the importance of interpreting symbols in their broader social and cultural context, offering a fresh perspective on the unconscious and its role in psychoanalytic practice. Ultimately, we challenge the traditional interpretation of Freud's penis envy theory and advocate for a more nuanced understanding of the unconscious within psychoanalysis.
Keywords:
Freud, penis envy, psychoanalysis, unconscious, gender inequalityDownloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10579882%20Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Emily Brown , Christopher Lee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological monographs: General and applied, 70(9), 1-70.
Bizzi, I. Z. (2022). Pioneer women in psychoanalysis: Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the fates of the primitive objerct. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 42(7), 523–543.
https://doi-og.proxy181.nclive.org/10.1080/07351690.2022.2121141
Bornstein, R. F. (2006). A Freudian construct lost and reclaimed: The psychodynamics of personality pathology.Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 339–353. https://doiorg.proxy181.nclive.org/10.1037/07369735.23.2.339
Freud, S. (1910). Three Contributions to the Sexual Theory. (A.A. Brill, Trans.). Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing Company.
Freud, S. (1931). Female Sexuality. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XXI (1927-1931): The Future of an Illusion, Civilization and its Discontents, andOther Works, 221-244.
https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~cavitch/pdf-library/Freud_SE_Female_Sexuality_complete.pdf Freud, S. (1938, November). Sigmund Freud BBC Speech. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoC8BITnc08 Friedan, B. (2010). The Feminine Mystique. Penguin Classics.
Gersick, S, (2020). Penis Envy. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. K. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopediaof personality and individual differences. Springer (p. 3467-2371).
Grünbaum, A. (2006). Is Sigmund Freud’s psychoanalytic edifice relevant to the 21st century?Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 257–284. https://doi-org.proxy181.nclive.org/10.1037/0736-9735.23.2.257 Kuhn, T.S. (1996). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.University of Chicago Press.
Heidenheimer, A. J. (1989). Professional knowledge and state policy in comparative historical perspective: law and medicine in Britain, Germany, and the United States*. International Social Science Journal, 41(122), 529-553.
Horney, K. (1967). Feminine psychology. W. W. Norton & Company.
Horney, K. (1924). On the genesis of the castration complex in women.International Journal of psychoanalysis, 5, 50-65.
Horney, K. (1926). The flight from womanhood. International Journal of psychoanalysis, 7, 324-329.
Hunnex, M.M. (1986). Chronological and thematic charts of philosophies and philosophers. Zondervan Publishing House.
Lothane, Z. (2006). Freud’s legacy--is it still with us? Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 285–301. https://doiorg.proxy181.nclive.org/10.1037/0736-9735.23.2.285
Marson, S.M. (1991). The utility of a Marxian framework for the sociology of aging. [Doctoral dissertation, North Carolina State University University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global.
Meissner, W. W. (2006). Prospects for psychoanalysis in the 21st century. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 239–256. https://doi-org.proxy181.nclive.org/10.1037/0736-9735.23.2.239
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67(4), 371.
Piaget, J. (1963). The origins of intelligence in children. W W Norton & Co.
Reppen, J. (Ed.) (2006). The relevance of Sigmund Freud for the 21st century. Psychanalytic Psychology, 23(2).
Ruti, M. (2018). Penis Envy and Other Bad Feelings: The Emotional Costs of Everyday Life. Columbia University Press.
Shulman, M.E. (2021). What use is Freud? Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 69(6), 1093– 1113.
Skinner, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms: an experimental analysis. Appleton-Century.
Strenger, C. (2006). Freud’s forgotten evolutionary project. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 420–429. https://doiorg.proxy181.nclive.org/10.1037/0736-9735.23.2.420
Summers, F. (2006). Freud’s relevance for contemporary psychoanalytic technique.Psychoanalytic Psychology,23(2), 327–338. https://doi-org.proxy181.nclive.org/10.1037/0736-9735.23.2.327 Thomas, I.T. (1928). The Child in America: Behavior Problems and Programs. A.A. Knopf.
Wallerstein, R. S. (2006). The relevance of Freud’s psychoanalysis in the 21st century: Its science and its research. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23(2), 302–326. https://doiorg.proxy181.nclive.org/10.1037/07369735.23.2.302
Zimbardo, P.G., Haney, C., Banks, W.C., & Jaffe, D. (1973, April 8). The mind is a formidable jailer: A Pirandellian prison. The New York Times Magazine, Section 6, pp. 38, ff.
