Top Journal of Public Policy and Administration (TJPPA)

ELEVATING JUSTICE: A SCRUTINY OF INVESTIGATION WARRANT SUBMISSIONS ALIGNED WITH VALUE PRINCIPLES

Authors

  • Aulia Rahman Hidayat Faculty of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia
  • Agung Santoso Wibowo Doctorate Student of Law, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia

Abstract

The criminal justice system is fundamentally grounded in the presumption of innocence until guilt is proven, underscoring the importance of safeguarding the rights of individuals involved (Baker & Williams, 2018). This necessitates a vigilant examination of the legal framework governing investigation warrant submissions, ensuring alignment with justice value principles. Investigation warrants, authorizing actions such as property searches, evidence seizures, and suspect arrests, play a pivotal role in law enforcement procedures (Gosselin & Bouchard, 2019). Nevertheless, the process of acquiring these warrants must adhere to standards of lawfulness, fairness, and justice. The essence of justice value lies in upholding principles of fairness, equity, and impartiality within the criminal justice system (Tyler, 2018). This concept acts as a cornerstone, guaranteeing equitable treatment and the protection of individual rights. It serves as a crucial factor in cultivating public trust in the criminal justice system, ensuring that law enforcement agencies steer clear of discriminatory practices (Schedler, 2020). Empirical evidence underscores the tight link between public trust and the perception of fairness and impartiality within the criminal justice system (Sunshine & Tyler, 2003). Notably, research indicates that individuals perceiving the system as unfair are less likely to cooperate with law enforcement and exhibit a higher likelihood of engaging in illegal activities (Gau & Brunson, 2010). This study delves into the intricate relationship between justice value principles, the process of obtaining investigation warrants, and their broader implications on public trust and cooperation with law enforcement. By examining the nexus between procedural fairness in the legal system and societal attitudes, this research aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on the importance of aligning investigative practices with justice value principles. Insights gleaned from this study have the potential to inform policy discussions, guiding the refinement of legal frameworks to ensure a more just, equitable, and trustworthy criminal justice system.

Keywords:

Criminal Justice System, Investigation Warrants, Justice Value Principles, Public Trust, Procedural Fairness

Published

2024-01-23

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10556416

How to Cite

Hidayat, A. R., & Wibowo, A. S. (2024). ELEVATING JUSTICE: A SCRUTINY OF INVESTIGATION WARRANT SUBMISSIONS ALIGNED WITH VALUE PRINCIPLES. Top Journal of Public Policy and Administration (TJPPA), 11(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10556416

References

Baker, J. A., & Williams, D. C. (2018). The presumption of innocence: An international human rights law

perspective. Cambridge University Press.

Gau, J. M., & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural justice and order maintenance policing: A study of inner-city

young men's perceptions of police legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27(2), 255-279.

Gosselin, D., & Bouchard, M. (2019). The use of search warrants in Canadian criminal investigations: Issues and

challenges. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 61(2), 187-207.

Kornblum, A. (2018). Reasonable suspicion: The legal standard that lets cops stop-and-frisk. Vox. Retrieved from

https://www.vox.com/cards/police-brutality-shootings-us/stop-and-frisk

McMullan, C., & Yar, M. (2016). The legality of police search and seizure in counter-terrorism: The UK

experience. The British Journal of Criminology, 56(3), 497-515.

Schedler, A. (2020). The value of justice. In P. R. Kleiderman, M. E. Groll, & P. L. Hamm (Eds.), The Routledge

handbook of the philosophy and science of punishment (pp. 161-172). Routledge.

Sklansky, D. A. (2018). Search warrants and the fourth amendment. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy,

(2), 387-422.

Stark, J. (2017). The police power and the search for common law remedies. In J. F. Baer, R. J. Bamberger, & M.

J. Benza (Eds.), Searching for the state in British legal thought (pp. 181-203). Cambridge University Press.

Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for

policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513-548.

Tyler, T. R. (2018). Procedural justice: An overview. In S. L. Hall, S. G. Halabi, & A. R. Markovits (Eds.),

Procedural justice (pp. 1-21). Springer.

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.