International Journal of Allied Sciences (IJAS)

COMMUNICATING SCIENCE, HEALTH, AND ENVIRONMENT: PATHWAYS FOR SUSTAINABLE AWARENESS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT

Authors

  • Bufumoh Akpoebi Alex (PhD) Department of English and Communication Arts, Ignatius Ajuru University of Education, Rivers State, Nigeria
  • Eke, Chigozi (PhD) Department of Linguistics and Communication Studies, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Abstract

This study examined the communication of science, health, and environment (SHE): pathways for sustainable awareness and public engagement. The knowledge gap theory was anchored in this study. This study adopted a qualitative research design to explore how science, health, and the environment communication fosters sustainable awareness and public engagement. The study population comprises approximately 1,200 residents of Port Harcourt Metropolis, including health workers, environmental advocates, science educators, and community members who are directly or indirectly influenced by science, health, and environmental communication. A sample size of 48 participants was selected and distributed across six focus groups of eight members each. This study employed a purposive sampling technique. Focus Group Discussions served as the main method of data collection, guided by a semi-structured discussion protocol. Data were transcribed and analyzed thematically. The findings revealed that science health, and environmental information are communicated more effectively when messages are delivered in a clear, simple language, tailored to local languages and cultures, and disseminated through trusted, interactive media platforms that allow for dialog. The study concluded that the effective communication of science health, and environmental information depends on the simplification of messages, their embedding in local cultural and linguistic contexts, and their delivery through trusted, interactive platforms that encourage dialogue and mutual understanding. The study recommended that science, health, and environmental messages should be simplified, translated into local languages, and shared through trusted interactive platforms

Keywords:

Communicating Science, Health, teaching environment, Sustainable Awareness, Public Engagement.

Published

2025-09-11

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17100414

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bufumoh, A. A., & Eke, C. (2025). COMMUNICATING SCIENCE, HEALTH, AND ENVIRONMENT: PATHWAYS FOR SUSTAINABLE AWARENESS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT. International Journal of Allied Sciences (IJAS), 16(9), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17100414

References

Azhar, S., et al. (2021). Science communication for sustainable agricultural and public health innovations. Journal of Agricultural Communication Studies, 45(3), 115–128.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Burns, T. W., O’Connor, D. J., & Stocklmayer, S. M. (2003). Science communication: A contemporary definition. Public Understanding of Science, 12(2), 183–202.

Dutta, M. J. (2008). Communicating health: A culture-centered approach. Polity Press.

Irwin, A. (2014). From deficit to democracy (re-visited). Public Understanding of Science, 23(1), 71–76.

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

Lee, K., Gjersoe, N., O’Neill, S., & Barnett, J. (2020). The role of uncertainty in public perceptions of climate change. Risk Analysis, 40(5), 1013–1029.

Lee, N. M., & VanDyke, M. S. (2015). Science communication and public engagement: Exploring the influence of message clarity on public understanding. Science Communication, 37(2), 139–160.

Lopes, R. M. (2024). Scientific communication and scientific literacy for the environmental, health, and public well-being. Frontiers in Communication.

National Research Council. (2014). Sustainable infrastructures for life science communication: Workshop summary. National Academies Press.

Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1767–1778.

Potochnik, A., & Jacquart, M. (2025). Public engagement with science. Cambridge University Press.

Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290.

Schiavo, R. (2014). Health communication: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Science Societies. (2025). Value of diversifying science communications in research. CSA News, 69(12), 24–29.

Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159–170.

Wakefield, M. A., Loken, B., & Hornik, R. C. (2010). The use of mass media campaigns to change health behavior. The Lancet, 376(9748), 1261–1271.

Wibeck, V. (2014). Enhancing public engagement in climate change: A dialogue-based approach. Environmental Communication, 8(4), 465–485.

Wikipedia contributors (2025a). Science communication. In Wikipedia.

Wikipedia contributors (2025b). Environmental communication. In Wikipedia.

Wikipedia contributors (2025c). Environmental education. In Wikipedia.

Wikipedia contributors (2025d). Public engagement. In Wikipedia.

Wikipedia contributors (2025e). Action for climate empowerment. In Wikipedia.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.