American International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology (AIJCSIT)

REENGINEERING HUMAN COMMUNICATION: A TECHNOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE OF ELON MUSK NEURALINK AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DIGITAL AUTONOMY

Authors

  • Eke Chigozi (Phd) Department of Linguistics and Communication Studies, University of Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria

Abstract

This study examined the reengineering human communication: a technological and social analysis of Elon Musk neuralink’s brain-computer interface and its implications for digital autonomy. The theory of media technological determinism theory formed the anchor for this research. This study adopted the qualitative case study method. The population for this study comprises communication technology experts, neuroethicists, digital rights advocates, and tech policy researchers, estimated at 450 individuals across institutions, think tanks and organizations actively engaged in neuroscience, emerging technologies, and digital governance. This population includes scholars affiliated with global research centers such as the IEEE Brain Initiative, the Neuralink team, UNESCO’s Bioethics Committee and digital rights bodies in Africa and Europe. A purposive sample of 20 participants was selected from this population based on their expertise, published works, or policy involvement related to BCIs, communication technology, and neuroethics. Purposive sampling was chosen to ensure the selection of information-rich participants. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis, which is suitable for identifying, analyzing, and interpreting recurring patterns and themes within qualitative data. Neuralink’s brain-computer interface fundamentally reengineers human communication by bypassing traditional language-based and symbolic systems, allowing direct neural-to-digital expression that challenges existing communication models and introduces new cognitive pathways for interaction. The research concluded that Neuralink’s brain-computer interface redefines the nature of human communication by enabling direct brain-to-machine interaction, signaling a shift from traditional symbolic communication to neural expression and thus marking the emergence of a new communicative paradigm that challenges existing models and expands the boundaries of human interaction. The research recommended that the Neuralink team and global communication research institutes collaborate to develop new communication models that incorporate neural-based interaction and redefine the role of the brain as a communication medium.

Keywords:

Reengineering Human Communication, Technological, Social Analysis, Elon Musk Neuralink's Brain-Computer Interface, Digital Autonomy

Published

2025-08-18

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16893426

How to Cite

Eke , C. (2025). REENGINEERING HUMAN COMMUNICATION: A TECHNOLOGICAL AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACE OF ELON MUSK NEURALINK AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR DIGITAL AUTONOMY. American International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology (AIJCSIT), 10(4), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16893426

References

Adeleke, O. (2022). Ethics of artificial intelligence and neural technologies in Nigerian society. Nigerian Journal of Communication Studies, 30(1), 34–48.

Birbaumer, N., & Cohen, L. G. (2007). Brain–computer interfaces: Communication and restoration of movement in paxalisib. The Journal of Physiology, 579(3), 621–636.

Bostrom, N. (2005). Transhumanist values. Journal of Philosophical Research, 30(Supplement), 3–14.

Chiekh, A. & El-Salhy, M. (2020). Africa’s digital transformation and the promise of AI. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 12(7), 821–832. Doi.10.1016/j.ajt.2012.09.010

Fins, J. J. (2021). Rights come to mind: Brain injury, ethics, and the struggle for consciousness. Cambridge University Press.

Goering, S., Yuste, R., & Schüll, N. D. (2021). Towards neurorights. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(8), 850–854.

Ienca, M., & Andorno, R. (2017). Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology. Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 13(1), 5.

Ienca, M., & Vayena, E. (2018). On the responsible use of digital data to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Medicine, 26(4), 463–464.

Lavazza, A. (2018). Freedom of thought and mental integrity: The moral requirements for any legal regulation of neurotechnologies. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 12, 82. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00082

McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. McGraw-Hill.

Musk, E. (2019). An integrated brain-machine interface platform with thousands of channels. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(10), e16194. https://doi.org/10.2196/16194

Tegmark, M. (2017). Life 3.0: Being human in the age of artificial intelligence. Alfred A. Knopf.

Williams, R. (1974). Television: Technology and cultural form. Schocken Books.

Wolpaw, J. R., & Wolpaw, E. W. (Eds.). (2012). Brain-computer interfaces: Principles and practice. Oxford University Press.

Yuste, R., Goering, S., Arcas, B. A. Y., Bi, G., Carmena, J. M., Carter, A. & Wolpaw, J. (2017). Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI. Nature, 551(7679), 159 –163.

Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.