INNOVATIVE AUGMENTATION: REIMAGINING HISTORY WITH TWO-DIMENSIONAL TECH IN SUMMER RESORTS
Abstract
This paper examines the changing pricing mechanisms used to finance scholarly communication in physics in the 20th century. The paper argues that the American Institute of Physics (AIP) sought to create a new source of revenue in a time when there was decreased revenue from author page charges and reader subscriptions. The paper traces the AIP's efforts to legitimize the page charge pricing mechanism in the 1930s, the erosion of revenue from this source in the 1960s, and the reaction of the scholarly society to changes in the copyright law in the 1970s. The paper then outlines the revised copyright law passed in 1976 and the policies the AIP adopted around this revised law to potentially capture revenue from selling access to the scholarly article. The paper concludes with a discussion of the role served by the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) in the years immediately after the 1976 Copyright Act.
Keywords:
Scholarly Communication, Physics, Pricing Mechanisms, Copyright, Aip, CccDownloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10255255Issue
Section
How to Cite
References
Adkinson, Burton (1963).“Primary Scientific Publication and the Federal Government,” Science 140, no. 3567 (1963): 613-17.
AIP (1949).“Institute Doings,” Physics Today 2, no. 6.29 and 38-39.
AIP (1952). “Director's Report for 1951,” Physics Today 5, no. 5. 4-10.
AIP (1958).“Annual Report, 1957,” Physics Today 11, no. 6. 15-21.
AIP (1960).“Annual Report, 1959,” Physics Today 13, no. 5. 16-25.
AIP (1971). “AIP Annual Report: 1970,” Physics Today 23, no. 6. 38-43.
AIP (1975). “Viewing AIP in 1974,” Physics Today 27, no. 6. 45-53.
AIP (1979). “The AIP in 1978,” Physics Today 31, no. 8. 43-50.
AIP (1985).“The AIP in 1984: A Year for Review and Endorsement,” Physics Today 37, no. 7.46-54, on 54.
Barton, H. (1963). “The Publication Charge Plan in Physics Journals.” Physics Today. 16. 45-57.
Capital Systems Group, Inc (1976).Page-Charge Policies and Practices in Scientific and Technical Publishing: A Historical Summary and Annotated Bibliography (Springfield, Va: National Technical Information Service).
Gorman, Robert (1978). “An Overview of the Copyright Act of 1976,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 126, no. 4. 856-884
Hodes, Bernard (1967). “The AIP in 1966,” Physics Today 20, no. 5. 45-53.
Hutchisson, Elmer (1964). “AIP Annual Report, 1963,” Physics Today 17, no. 5. 43-59.
Kaiser, David (2002). “Cold War Requisitions, Scientific Manpower, and the Production of American
Physicists after WW II,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 33, no. 1. 131-59.
Kevles, Daniel (1995).The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Krumhansl, J.A. (1977). “Contribute Your Copyright.” Physics Today 30, no. 9. 104.
Scheiding, Thomas (2009). “Paying for Physics Knowledge One Page at a Time: The Author Fee in Physics in Twentieth-Century America.” Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 39, no. 2. 219-47.
Scheiding, Thomas (2013).“Using Industrial Patronage to Manage Growth and Change in 20th Century American Physics.”Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44, no. 4. 450-463.
Strawhorn, John M. (1979).Development of a Planning Guide to Innovation in the Dissemination of Scientific Information: Final Report, (Rockville, MD: Capital Systems Group).
iA definitive history of the AIP‟s founding is Scheiding (2013). In the annual reports of the AIP throughout the 1960s, the page charge was identified in balance sheets as a “contribution for dissemination.” The AIP in the 1960s also extended its collection of author charges to a voluntary abstract charge. Despite rampant inflation, these rates were kept low because of price controls imposed by President Richard Nixon. In real terms, both page charge revenue and the amount of the page charge declined.
H. William Koch archival papers, Box 4, Folder 32. Letter from Wallace Waterfall to Bill Koch, 29 March 1968.
vH. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 32. 11 July 1968. Letter from Koch to Hubert Sauter. Director, Clearinghouse for Federal Scientific and Technical Information.
viH. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 32. 23 February 1968. Letter from Hugh Wolfe to Bill Koch.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 34. 3 April 1972. Updates to Williams & Wilkens.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 34. 6 July 1971. Letter from Williams & Wilkens to National Institutes of Health.
ixH. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 34. 29 August 1972. Letter from AIP to Davies, Hardy, Ives, and Lawther.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 32. 15 November 1973. “AIP Report on Copyright to Executive Committees.”
Ibid.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 6, folder 8. 17 August 1973. Letter from Koch to AIP Executive Committee.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 33. 23 October 1973. “Proposed Copyright Policy for the AIP and its Member Societies.”
H. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 32. 15 November 1973. “AIP Report on Copyright to Executive Committee.”
H. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 32. 25 June 1973. Letter from APS to AIP.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 33. 23 October 1973. Letter from APS to AIP.
Ibid.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 48, folder 25. William Koch 1976 Copyright Testimony.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 13, folder 1. January 25, 1977. Letter from Charles Lieb to Koch
Ibid.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 13, folder 1. 7 February 1977. AIP Executive Committee minutes.
Krumhansl (1977), 104.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 46, folder 21. 5 March 1977. Letter from James Krumhansl to Bill Koch.
xxiv H. William Koch archival papers, box 4, folder 32. 17 April 1972. AIP memo from RH Marks to Koch
H. William Koch archival papers, box 13, folder 3. 2 May 1977. “Implications of New Copyright Law for Scientific Societies.”
H. William Koch archival papers, box 13, folder 3. 3 August 1977. “Initial Guidelines for Participation by Serial Publishers in the Programs of the CCC.”
H. William Koch archival papers, box 13, folder 1. 8-9 September 1977. AIP Executive Committee minutes.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 48, folder 25. 15 November 1982. IRS vs. CCC.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 53, folder 2. 30 May 1979. “A Summary of the Copyright Clearance Center‟s First Year Operating Experience.”
H. William Koch archival papers, box 54, folder 19. 8 October 1980. “Comments by H. William Koch before the United States Copyright Office.”
Ibid.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 53, folder 6. 1 November 1979. CCC Progress Report.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 53, folder 4. 21 November 1978.Letter from Martin Tash to Michael Harris xxxivIbid.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 53, folder 4. 20 September 1978. Draft of letter from David Waite to CCC participating publishers.
Ibid. xxxviiIbid. xxxviiiIbid.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 54, folder 19. 8 October 1980. “Comments by H. William Koch before the United States Copyright Office.”
H. William Koch archival papers, box 31, folder 13. 4 June 1981. Letter from David Lazarus to Norman Ramsey.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 31, folder 13. 7 July 1981. Letter from David Lazarus to Norman Ramsey.
Ibid.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 31, folder 13. 21 July 1981. Letter from C.B. Duke to David Lazarus.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 53, folder 5. 26 February 1980. “Statement of Facts and Issues.”
Ibid.
H. William Koch archival papers, box 53, folder 24. 10 November 1982. United States Tax Court Ruling.
