TRADE DYNAMICS AND BEYOND: EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY AND REGULATORY QUALITY ON ECONOMIC GROWTH
Abstract
The literature of the 1990s elevated institutions to a pivotal role, conducting analyses to underscore their crucial significance in economic development and the efficacy of economic policy measures. North (1990) pioneered this perspective by highlighting the vital role of institutions in economic development. Subsequent studies, such as Mauro (1995), delved into the detrimental impact of corruption on investment and economic growth in developing countries. Engerman and Sokoloff (2003) further posited the existence of economies of scale attributed to the quality of institutions and trade openness in shaping economic development. Additionally, Dollar and Kraay (2003) contended that nations with robust institutions tend to engage more in international trade. Notwithstanding, much of the existing literature explores the connections between institutions and trade while overlooking their impact on economic growth (Lavallée, 2006; Levchenko, 2013; Avom and Gandjon, 2014; Gandjon, 2017). In the realm of economic literature during the 1990s, institutions emerged as focal points, garnering attention for their fundamental role in economic development. North (1990) laid the groundwork for this paradigm shift, elucidating the indispensable nature of institutions in fostering economic progress. Expanding on this discourse, Mauro (1995) delved into the corrosive effects of corruption on investment and economic growth, particularly in the context of developing countries. Engerman and Sokoloff (2003) advanced the discussion by proposing the existence of economies of scale resulting from the interplay of robust institutions and trade openness in influencing economic development. Dollar and Kraay (2003) further contributed to the narrative by asserting a positive correlation between strong institutions and increased participation in international trade. Despite these noteworthy contributions, there remains a notable gap in the literature where the focus on institutions primarily centers on their relationship with trade, largely neglecting their impact on economic growth. This oversight is evident in studies by Lavallée (2006), Levchenko (2013), Avom and Gandjon (2014), and Gandjon (2017), which, while exploring the connection between institutions and trade dynamics, fall short in addressing their broader implications for economic growth. This paper seeks to bridge this gap by reexamining the relationship between institutions and economic growth. By extending beyond the conventional examination of institutions solely in the context of trade, we aim to offer a more comprehensive understanding of their multifaceted influence on the overall economic development trajectory. The subsequent analysis will contribute to a nuanced comprehension of the intricate interplay between institutions, trade, and economic growth, fostering more informed policy discussions and strategic interventions.
Keywords:
Institutions, Economic Growth, Trade, Development, Corruption.Downloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10580336%20Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Philemon Votsoma, Charles Bita , Zara Christy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Abessolo Y.A. (2005). Ouverture commerciale : condition de la contribution du capital humain à la croissance économique des pays en développement, Centre d’économie du développement, IFReDE-GRES, Université de Bordeaux IV.
Arellano, M., Bover, O. (1995). Another Look at the Instrumental-Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models. Journal of Econometrics. 68 (1), 29-51.
Avom, D., Gandjon, F. S. G., (2014). Qualité du cadre juridique, corruption et commerce international : le cas de la CEMAC.Revue d'économie politique. 124 (1),158.
Blundell, R. Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics. 87 (5), 115-143.
Bonal, M., Mehmet E. (2015) “Political Institutions, Trade Openness, and Economic Growth: New Evidence” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1011514
Bouloud, G. B., (2013).Libéralisation des échanges et croissance : les expériences du Congo et du Cameroun. Annales des Sciences Economiques et de Gestion de l’Université Marien Ngouabi,14 (2), 1-19.
Busse, M., Koniger, J. (2012). Trade and Economic Growth : A Reexamination of the Empirical Evidence. HWWI Research Paper no. 123.
Chang, R., Kaltani, L. Loayza, N. V. (2005). Openness can be good for growth : The role of policy complementarities. Journal of Development Economics, 90 (1), 33-49.
Constantinos, A., Persefoni, T., Hashim R. O., (2014). InstitutionaL Quality and Economic Growth : Empirical evidence from the Sudanese Economy.Economicannals, 203 (8), 3-33 .
Devarajan, S., F. Wolfgang., (2013). L’essor économique de l’Afrique : motifs d’optimisme et de pessimisme, Revue d’Economie du Développement. 21 (2), 97-113.
Dinkneh, G. B., Yushi J., (2016). The Impact of Africa-China Trade Openness on Technology Transfer and Economic Growth for Africa : A Dynamic Panel Data Approach. Annals of economics and finance, 17(2), 403431.
Dollar, D. Kraay, A. (2003). Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics 50 (1), 133–162.
Edwards S. (1998), « Openness, Productivity and Growth : What Do we Really Know ? », Economic Journal, 108 (2) 383-398.
Engerman, S. L. Kenneth L. Sokoloff (2003). Institutional and Non-Institutional Explanations of Economic Differences. In National Bureau of Economic ResearchWorking Papers. 225
Frankel, J A., Romer, D., (1999). Does Trade Cause Growth? The American Economic Review, 89, (3), 379-399.
Gandjon, F. G. S, (2017) « Régime politique et ouverture commerciale », Revue d'économie politique 127 (3), 423-454.
Greenaway, D., Morgan, W., Wright, P., (2002). Trade liberalization and growth in developing countries. J. Dev. Econ. 67 (2) 229–244.
Hanushek, E.A., Kimko, D.D., (2000). Schooling, labor-force quality, and the growth of nations. Amer. Econ. Rev. 1184–1208.
Kaufmann, D. Kraay, A. Mastruzzi, M. (2004). Governance Matters III : Governance Indicators for 1996-2002. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3106. Washington, D.C. : World Bank.
Kilishi, A. A., H. I. Mobolaji, M. A. Yaru, A. T. Yakubu, (2013). Institutions and Economic Performance in SubSaharan Africa : A Dynamic Panel Data Analysis. Journal of African Development 15(2), 91-120.
Koeniger, J., Silberberger, M., (2015). Regulation, Trade and Economic Growth. Discussion papers.Number 255. Center For European, Gouvernance and Economic developement research.
Krenz, A., (2016).Do Political Institutions Influence International Trade ? Measurement of Institutions and the Longrun. Center For European, Gouvernance, and Economic Developpement Research, No, 276, Discussion paper ; SSN : 1439-2305
Lavallée, E. (2006). Similarité institutionnelle, qualité des institutions et commerce international. Economieinternationale, 108 (4), 27-58.
Levchenko, A. (2013). International trade and institutional change. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29 (1), 1145–1181.
Levine, R., Renelt, D., (1992). A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-Country Growth Regressions. American Economic Review, 82, 942–63.
Linh Bun, B.S. (2009). Trade, Economic Growth And Quality Of Institutions In Asean : A Case Study. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of
Mankiw, G., Romer, D., Weil, D. (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107 (2), 407-437.
Matthew, A. Oluwatoyin, B. FolasadeAdegboye, (2014). Trade Openness, Institutions and Economic Growth in subSaharan Africa (SSA). Developing Country Studies 4(8), 18-30.
Mauro, P., (1995). Corruption and growt. Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol, 110 (3), 681-712.
Mina, B., Ndikumana, L., (2007). The Growth Effects of Openness to Trade and the Role of Institutions:New Evidence from African Countries. Working Paper, 1-28
Mondjeli N, I., M. Tsopmo. P.C., (2017). The effects on Economic Growth of Natural Resources in Sub-Saharan Africa : Does the quality of institutions matters ? Economics Bulletin.37, (1).
Niyongabo, G., (2007). Politiques d’ouverture Commerciale et Développement Economique. Thèse de Doctorat en
Sciences Economiques. Université d’Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand I Faculté des Sciences Economiques et de Gestion Centre ’Etudes et de Recherches sur le Développement International (CERDI)
North, D, C., (1990). Institutions, Institutional change and economic Performance, Cambridge University Press. New York.
Romer P.M, (1991). Endogenous technological change. Journal of political economy, 98, (5), pp.71-102.
Roodman D. M. (2009), « A Note on the Theme of Too Many Instruments », Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71, 135-158.
Sachs, J. D. Warner, A., (1995), Economic Reform and the Process of Global Integration, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 26(1),1-118.
Transparency International (2010), Database Corruption, Transparency International
Transparency International (2016), Global Corruption Report 2016, Transparency International Berlin, Germany
Vitola, A., Senfelde, M (2015). The Role of institutions in Economic Performance. Verslas :Teorijairpraktika / Business, 16 (3): 271–279
Wacziarg, R., Welch, K.H., (2008). Trade liberalization and growth : new evidence. World Bank Econ. Rev. 22, 187– 231.
WDI (2018). World Development Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank. WEO(2017), Statistcic data, World Economic Outlook, octobre
WGI (2018). World Gouvernance Indicators. Washington, DC: World Bank. http://www.worldbank
Yanikkaya, H., (2003). Trade openness and economic growth : a cross-country empirical investigation. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 57–89.
