ADAPTIVE LEADERSHIP AND CHANGE CAPABILITY: CATALYSTS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL AGILITY IN ZIMBABWEAN MOBILE NETWORKS
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of leadership and change capability on organizational agility within Zimbabwe's major mobile network providers. Organizational agility, a relatively recent area of organizational research, is influenced by independent variables such as leadership and change capability. In the past, organizations enjoyed a competitive advantage due to low competition and high entry barriers in their markets, leading to industry dominance. However, in the era of globalization, individuals with Internet access and the right skills can establish organizations that compete globally, intensifying competition for established entities. Given the rapid pace of technological advancement, organizations must adapt and become agile to survive in the current environment. This study focused on three prominent mobile network providers in Zimbabwe: Econet Wireless, Net One Zimbabwe, and Telecel Zimbabwe, with a specific emphasis on leadership and organizational change capability as key variables. The proposed model aims to significantly aid organizations in cultivating agility to navigate the competitive landscape. Employing a mixed-methods research approach, the study findings indicate that a focus on change capability and shared leadership contributes to the development of agile organizations. Statistical analysis reveals a strong significance between leadership, change capability, and organizational agility, with hypothesis testing resulting in a 95% significant interval
Keywords:
Leadership and change capability, organizational agility, agility effect.Downloads
Published
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12821100Issue
Section
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sarah J. Chigwende , Tawanda M. Gomo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Akkaya B, Tabak A (2020). The link between organizational agility and leadership: A research in science parks. Academy of Strategic Management Journal 19(1):1-17.
Almahamid S, Awwad A, McAdams AC (2010). Effects of organizational agility and knowledge sharing on competitive advantage: An empirical study in Jordan. International Journal of Management 27(3):387.
Bass BM, Bass R (2009). The Bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications. Simon and Schuster.
Burns JM (2012). Leadership. Open Road Media.
Bushra F, Usman A, Naveed A (2011). Effect of transformational leadership on employees’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment in banking sector of Lahore (Pakistan). International journal of Business and Social science 2(18):261-267.
Campbell TA (2014). What could have been done? Circuit City: A case study of management and employee performance failure. Performance Improvement 53(4):16-23.
Cashman K (2008). Leadership from the inside out (EasyRead Super Large 18pt Edition).
Creswell JW (2003). Research Design: Qualitative. Quantitative, and mixed methods approach (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Johnson RB, Onwuegbuzie AJ, Turner LA (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 1(2):112-133.
Joiner WB, Josephs SA (2006). Leadership agility: Five levels of mastery for anticipating and initiating change (Vol. 164). John Wiley & Sons.
Kim WG, Brymer RA (2011). The effects of ethical leadership on manager job satisfaction, commitment, behavioral outcomes, and firm performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management 30(4):1020-1026.
Maud L, Mayo M, Meindl JR Pastor J (2020). Social network approach. Unpublished.
Maxwell JC (1998). The 21 irrefutable laws of leadership: Follow them and people will follow you. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson Publishers.
Mclaggan E, Bezuidenhout A, Botha CT (2013). Leadership Style and Organisational Commitment in the Mining Industry in Mpumalanga. South African Journal of Human Resource Management 11:1-9.
Najrani M (2016). The endless opportunity of organizational agility.
Strategic Direction 32(3):37-38.
Northouse PG (1999). Leadership: Theory and practice (P 23). Sage.
Northouse PG (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice. Sage publications.
Oliveira MA, Valentina LD, Possamai O (2012). Forecasting project performance considering the influence of leadership style on organizational agility. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 61(6):653-671.
Pulakos J (2019). 3D printing disrupts manufacturing. Research Technology Management 56(6):12-16.
Robbins SP, Judge TA (2017). Organizational behavior. pearson.
Seers A, Keller T, Wilkerson JM (2003). Can team members share leadership. Shared leadership: Reframing the hows and whys of leadership pp. 77-102.
Setili A (2014). The agility advantage: how to identify and act on opportunities in a fast-changing world.
Soparnot R (2011). The concept of organizational change capacity. Journal of Organizational Change Management 24(5):640-661.
Steyrer J, Schiffinger M, Lang R (2008). Organizational commitment—A missing link between leadership behavior and organizational performance? Scandinavian Journal of Management 24(4):364-374.
Susanty AI, Budiharjo E, Winarto W (2022). Achieving an agile organisation in an Indonesian telecommunications company: investigation on leadership impact and mediation variables. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management 15(1):6-30.
Tashakkori A, Johnson R, Teddlie C (2021). Foundations of mixed methods research: integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches in the social and behavioral sciences (2nd). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Wadhwa S, Rao KS (2003). Enterprise modeling of supply chains involving multiple entity flows: role of flexibility in enhancing lead time performance. Studies in informatics and control 12(1):5-20.
Worley CG, Williams TD, Lawler EE (2014). Assessing organization agility: Creating diagnostic profiles to guide transformation. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
Yukl GA (2002). Leadership in organizations. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
