Advanced Journal of Environmental Sciences (AJES)

FEASIBILITY STUDY: A SOLUTION TO PROJECT VIABILITY

Authors

  • Eneje, Linus Chukwudi Department of Urban and Regional Planning, Faculty of Environmental science, Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT).

Abstract

This paper explores the significance of feasibility studies in ensuring the viability and sustainability of projects, particularly in the construction industry. It highlights that uncertainties are an inherent part of projects, but proper feasibility studies can mitigate risks and enhance project outcomes. The study emphasizes that project sustainability is closely linked to a thorough feasibility analysis, involving various stakeholders like clients, contractors, suppliers, and regulatory bodies. The paper defines a feasibility study as a critical tool for determining whether a project is technically, legally, and economically viable. It also discusses different types of feasibility studies marketing, technical, legal, environmental, and financial and outlines the components required for a comprehensive analysis. Furthermore, the work stresses the importance of involving professionals such as architects, engineers, and consultants in the feasibility study process to ensure the incorporation of sustainable practices and materials. The study concludes that a well-executed feasibility study is essential for the success of a project, particularly in developing countries like Nigeria, where construction activities are rapidly expanding. It argues that such studies should not only focus on financial aspects but also consider environmental and social impacts to achieve long-term sustainability.

Keywords:

Feasibility studies, Solution, Viability, Projects

Published

2024-10-09

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13909148

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Eneje, L. C. (2024). FEASIBILITY STUDY: A SOLUTION TO PROJECT VIABILITY. Advanced Journal of Environmental Sciences (AJES), 15(10), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13909148

References

Hutchins MJ, Sutherland JW. (2008) An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions. Journal of Cleaner Production; 16:1688–98.

Tam WYV (2008). Economic comparison of concrete recycling: a case study approach Resources. Conservation and Recycling; 52:821–8.

Hueting R (2009). Why environmental sustainability can most probably not be attained with growing production. Journal of Cleaner Production, In press (2009).

Vachon S, Mao Z. (2008) Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production; 16:1552–60.

Tam WYV, Shen LY, Yau RMY. (2007) On using a communication-mapping model for environmental management (CMEM) to improve environmental performance in project development processes Building and Environment;42: 3093–107.

Ruggieri L, Cadena E, Martinez-Blanco J, Gasol CM, Rieradevall J,

Gabarrell X, et al., (2009). Recovery of organic wastes in the Spanish wine industry. Technical, economic and environmental analyses of the composting process. Journal of Cleaner Production; 17:830–8.

Asokan P, Osmani M, Price ADF (2009). Assessing the recycling potential of glass fibre reinforced plastic waste in concrete and cement composites. Journal of Cleaner Production; 17:821–9.

Tam WYV. (2009) Comparing the implementation of concrete recycling in the Australian and Japanese construction industries. Journal of Cleaner Production; 17:688–702.

Tseng ML, Yuan-Hsu L, Chiu ASF. (2009) Fuzzy AHP based study of cleaner production implementation in Taiwan PWB manufacturer. Journal of Cleaner Production 2009; 17:1249–56.

Turk AM. (2009) The benefits associated with ISO 14001 certification for construction firms: Turkish case. Journal of Cleaner Production; 17:559-69. http://lib.ewubd.edu

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.