Top Linguistic and Language Journal (TLLJ)

THE EFFECTS OF TRADITIONAL FEEDBACK FORMS ON STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW AND VIDEO-BASED SOLUTIONS

Authors

  • Michael Robert Davis Department of Global Innovation, Social Emotional Learning, & Educational Technology, Sanford College of Education, National University, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Sophia Louise Martinez Department of Global Innovation, Social Emotional Learning, & Educational Technology, Sanford College of Education, National University, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Abstract

Video-recorded feedback has emerged as a highly effective tool in undergraduate English education, offering a practical and detailed method for delivering constructive criticism. This form of feedback provides students with the comprehensive and concrete evaluations they need to improve their work. Despite its advantages, understanding the specific elements that contribute to the effectiveness of video-recorded feedback remains crucial. This paper explores the aspects of video-recorded feedback that align with students' expectations for quality instructor feedback. Through an oral discussion, the study aims to uncover how video-recorded feedback can address students' needs for detailed critique while maintaining their academic equilibrium. By examining the interplay between video feedback's features and students' feedback expectations, the research seeks to enhance the overall impact of this method on student learning outcomes and satisfaction

Keywords:

Video Feedback, Student Perceptions, Constructive Criticism, English Education, Feedback Effectiveness

Downloads

Published

2024-07-29

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13120633

Issue

Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): April-June

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Davis , M. R., & Martinez , S. L. (2024). THE EFFECTS OF TRADITIONAL FEEDBACK FORMS ON STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW AND VIDEO-BASED SOLUTIONS . Top Linguistic and Language Journal (TLLJ), 9(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13120633

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Michael Robert Davis , Sophia Louise Martinez

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

References

Baker S, Formo DM, Headley C, Springer LMM (2021). Transforming the feedback paradigm: A qualitative study examining a student-centered, question-based pedagogy in college composition and literature courses. Teaching English in the Two-Year College 48(4):387-412.

Brito I, Oliveira E, Ramos L (2021). Do you trust me? A systematic literature review on student-teacher trust and school identification. In The European Conference on Education 2021: Official Conference Proceedings. The International Academic Forum pp. 451-464.

Cheng G, Chwo GSM, Ng WS (2023). Automated tracking of student revisions in response to teacher feedback in EFL writing: technological feasibility and teachers' perspectives. Interactive Learning Environments 31(8):5236-5260.

Guo W, Zhou W (2021). Relationships between teacher feedback and student motivation: A comparison between male and female students. Frontiers in Psychology 12:679575.

Harvie A (2021). Student Perceptions of Their Engagement with Online Writing as Influenced by Their Teacher’s Presence at a Virtual High School: A Mixed Methods Study. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina.

Jiang Y, Lee CKJ, Wan ZH, Chen J (2021). Stricter teacher, more motivated students? Comparing the associations between teacher behaviors and motivational beliefs of Western and East Asian learners. Frontiers in Psychology 11:564327.

Penn S, Brown N (2022). “Is Screencast Feedback Better Than Text Feedback for Student Learning in Higher Education? A Systematic Review. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal 15(2):1-18.

Rai A, Patyal VS, Maheshwari S (2022). The Mediating Role of Selfefficacy between Job Challenges and Work Engagement: Evidence from Indian Power Sector Employees. Journal of Public Affairs 22(3):e2494.

Ramani S, Könings KD, Ginsburg S, Van Der Vleuten CP (2020). Relationships as the backbone of feedback: exploring preceptor and resident perceptions of their behaviors during feedback conversations. Academic Medicine 95(7):1073-1081.

Sobirov A, Yakkubayeva S (2023). The ways of improving pupils’ speaking skills in English classes. Modern Science and Research 2(5):189-195.

Song BK (2022). Bifactor modelling of the psychological constructs of learner feedback literacy: conceptions of feedback, feedback trust and self-efficacy. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 47(8):1444-1457.

Van Der Kleij F (2023). Teacher and student perceptions of oral classroom feedback practices: a video-stimulated recall study. The Australian Educational Researcher 50(2):353-370.

Yeh HC, Tseng SS, Chen YS (2019). Using online peer feedback through blogs to promote speaking performance. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 22(1):1-14.