Abstract
Organizations increasingly adopt team-based structures to enhance adaptability and flexibility in dynamic environments. Effective teams are essential for meeting evolving demands, and team reflexivity has been identified as a crucial factor in team effectiveness. Defined as the extent to which team members collectively and openly discuss their objectives, processes, strategies, and plans, team reflexivity also encompasses conflict management, social support, and the promotion of a healthy social climate. This paper explores the concept of team reflexivity and its impact on organizational effectiveness. By synthesizing insights from seminal works by West (1996), Carter and West (1998), and Swift and West (1998), the study highlights how team reflexivity contributes to improved team performance and adaptability. The findings underscore the importance of fostering a reflective team environment to enhance organizational resilience and success
Keywords
How to Cite
References
Amason AC (1996). Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and
Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision. Acad. Manage. J., 39(1):
-148.
Ashby WR (1996). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Methuen.
Carnevale PJ, Probst TM (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving and categorization. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.,
: 1300-1309.
Carter S, West MA (1998). Reflexivity, defectiveness, and mental health in BBC-TV production teams. Small Group Res., 29(5): 583-601.
De Dreu CKW (2002). Team innovation and team effectiveness: The importance of minority dissent and reflexivity. Eur. J. Work. Organ.
Psychol., 11: 285-298.
De Dreu CKW, Carsten KW (2010). Team Innovation and Team Effectiveness: The Importance of Minority Dissent and Reflexivity. Eur. J. Work. Organ. Psychol., 11(3): 285-298.
De Dreu CKW, Nijstad BA, Van Knippenberg D (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 12: 22-49.
Eisenhardt K M (1997). how management teams can have a good fight. Harv. Bus. Rev., 75(4): 77-89.
Erez M, Earley P, Hulin C (1985). The impact of participation on goal acceptance and performance: A two-step model. Acad. Manage. J.,
: 50-66.
Galbraith JR (1973). Designing Complex Organization. Addison-Wesley,
Reading, MA.
Hambrick DC (1984). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label. Res. Organ. Behav., 9(2): 171-
Hambrick DC, Mason P (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad. Manage. Rev., 9: 193-206.
Hoegl M, Parboteeah KP (2006). Team reflexivity in innovative projects. Res. Dev. Manage., 36(2): 113-125.
Jehn KA (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Adm. Sci. Q., 40(2): 256-282.
Lawrence BS (1997). The black box of organizational demography.
Organ. Sci., 8(1): 1-22.
Lee-Kelley L, Blackman D (2005). In addition to shared goals: the impact of mental models on team innovation and learning. Int. J.
Innov. Learn., 2(1): 11-25.
Lerner JS, Tetlock PE(1999). Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychol. Bull., 125: 255–275.
MacCurtain S, Flood PC, Ramamoorthy N, West MA, Dawson JF (2010). The top management team reflexivity, knowledge sharing and new product performance: A study of the Irish software industry. Creativity Innov. Manage., 19(3): 219-232.
Müller A, Herbig B, Petrovic K (2009). The explication of implicit team knowledge and its supporting effect on team processes and technical innovations: An action regulation perspective on team reflexivity. Small Group Res., 40: 8–51.
Rahim MA (1982). measurement of organizational conflict. J. Gen. Psychol., 109(4): 189-199.
Roberto MA (2005). Why great leaders don’t take yes for an answer: Managing for conflict and consensus. Wharton School Publishing, Upper saddle River, NJ.
Schippers MC, Den Hartog DN, Koopman PL, Wienk JA (2003). Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. J. Organ. Behav., 24:779-802.
Schippers MC, Homan AC (2009). Breaking the negative performance spiral: The role of team reflexivity and team learning, Proceedings of the Sixty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (online program).
Schippers MC, West MA, Dawson JF (2010). Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Seventieth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (CD), ISSN 1543-8643.
Simonson I, Staw BM (1992). De-escalation strategies: A comparison of techniques for reducing commitment to losing courses of action. J.
Appl. Psychol., 77: 419–426.
Simons TR. Peterson (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. J. Appl.
Psychol., 85(1): 102-111.
Sundbo J (2003). The International Handbook of Innovation. Elsevier,
Amsterdam.
Swift TA, West MA (1998). Reflexivity and group process: research and practice. Sheffield: The ESRC Center for Organization and
Innovation.
Tjosvold D, Tang MML, West M (2004). Reflexivity for team innovation in China: the contribution of goal interdependence. Group Organ.
Manage., 29(5): 540-559.
West MA (1996). Reflexivity and work group effectiveness: A conceptual integration. In: West, M. A. Handbook of Work Group Psychology. Chichester, England: Wiley, pp. 555-579.
West MA (2000). Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. In M. M. Beyerlein,
West MA (2003). Innovation implementation in work teams. In P. B. Paulus & B. A. Nijstad (Eds.), Group creativity. Innovation through collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 245-276